Do Markets Respond More To More Reliable Labor Market Data? A Test of Market Rationality

Author
Keywords
Abstract

Since 1979, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has nearly quadrupled the size of the
sample used to estimate monthly employment changes. Although first-reported
employment estimates are still noisy, the magnitude of sampling variability has declined
in proportion to the increase in the sample size. A model of rational Bayesian updating
predicts that investors would assign more weight to the BLS employment survey as it
became more precise. However, a regression analysis of changes in interest rates on the
day the employment data are released finds no evidence that the bond market’s reaction
to employment news intensified in the late 1980s or 1990s; indeed, in the late 1990s and
early 2000s the bond markets hardly reacted to unexpected employment news. For the
time period as a whole, an unexpected increase of 200,000 jobs is associated with about a
6 basis point increase in the interest rate on 30 year Treasury bonds, and an 8 basis point
increase in the interest rate on 3 month bills, all else equal. Additionally, unexpected
changes in the unemployment rate and revisions to past months’ employment estimates
have statistically insignificant effects on long-term interest rates.

Year of Publication
1996
Number
367
Date Published
09/1996
Publication Language
eng
Citation Key
8373
URL
Working Papers